无码日韩精品一区二区免费暖暖,久久精品国产精品亚洲,开心播播网,女人床技48动态图,国产精品无码免费专区午夜

孫銳:建設光熱發電基地有利于實現高比例新能源電力外送
發布者:wwh | 來源:CSPPLAZA光熱發電網 | 0評論 | 4951查看 | 2019-07-23 19:35:15    

CSPPLAZA光熱發電網訊:近日,在由CSPPLAZA主辦、中控太陽能和龍騰光熱聯合主辦的2019第六屆中國國際光熱大會暨CSPPLAZA年會上,電力規劃設計總院副院長孫銳就建設光熱發電基地有利于實現高比例新能源電力外送作了主題發言。


微信圖片_20190719170456.jpg

圖:孫銳作主題發言


孫銳在發言(yan)中指出(chu),光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)主(zhu)要有以(yi)下幾點(dian)優勢:第(di)一,出(chu)力(li)穩(wen)定,可連續發電(dian)(dian);第(di)二(er),可根據電(dian)(dian)網負荷需(xu)求調峰;第(di)三,作為(wei)同步發電(dian)(dian)機電(dian)(dian)源(yuan),可為(wei)系統(tong)(tong)提供短(duan)路容量(liang),具(ju)備電(dian)(dian)壓支撐能力(li);第(di)四,可參與一次調頻和二(er)次調頻,并為(wei)系統(tong)(tong)提供轉動慣量(liang),增強系統(tong)(tong)穩(wen)定性。


同時(shi),孫銳就通過(guo)我國(guo)規劃建(jian)設(she)的西電(dian)(dian)東送(song)電(dian)(dian)力(li)通道(dao),實現高比例新(xin)能(neng)源電(dian)(dian)力(li)外送(song)給出了四種(zhong)方(fang)案,即(ji):煤電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)+光(guang)伏;少量(liang)(liang)煤電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)+光(guang)伏+電(dian)(dian)儲(chu)能(neng);少量(liang)(liang)煤電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)+光(guang)熱(re)發電(dian)(dian);光(guang)熱(re)發電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)。數據(ju)分析顯示,通過(guo)有(you)序建(jian)設(she)太陽能(neng)光(guang)熱(re)發電(dian)(dian)基地,充分利用(yong)這些電(dian)(dian)力(li)外送(song)通道(dao),采用(yong)光(guang)熱(re)發電(dian)(dian)全部替代燃煤發電(dian)(dian),外送(song)新(xin)能(neng)源電(dian)(dian)力(li)比重可達(da)到100%,而且經濟性更好。


微信截圖_20190722142338.png

表:四種(zhong)方案(an)下發(fa)電(dian)成本(ben)的(de)比較


孫銳表示,根(gen)據(ju)我國能源發(fa)展戰略,要實現電(dian)(dian)力(li)保障(zhang),必須要有可靠、靈活的(de)電(dian)(dian)源或是儲能電(dian)(dian)站提供電(dian)(dian)力(li)保障(zhang)。在新(xin)能源電(dian)(dian)力(li)中,光熱(re)(re)發(fa)電(dian)(dian)可以提供相應的(de)電(dian)(dian)力(li)保障(zhang),且其具有調節(jie)的(de)靈活性,在未來高比例新(xin)能源裝(zhuang)機的(de)條件下,光熱(re)(re)發(fa)電(dian)(dian)必將發(fa)揮其應有的(de)作用。


更多精彩內容,請閱讀下面刊出的孫銳的演講全文:


各位專家大家上午(wu)好!我今天主要(yao)匯報的內容包括:第一,我國電力發(fa)展現(xian)狀和(he)趨勢;第二(er),光熱發(fa)電的優(you)勢;第三(san),電力外送方(fang)案對比分析;第四,總結(jie)。


第一部分,關于我國能源發展現狀和戰略目標。


2018年(nian),全國能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)消(xiao)費總量為46.4億噸標(biao)準煤,其中非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)消(xiao)費占比達14.3%。按照我國能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)發展(zhan)戰(zhan)略(lve)——逐步采用非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)替代(dai)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan),計劃于(yu)2020年(nian)非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)在一次能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)消(xiao)費占比中達到15%,2030年(nian)達到20%,2050年(nian)達到50%。在非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)中,非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)電力(li)占比超過90%,那么要完(wan)成我國非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)發展(zhan)戰(zhan)略(lve)目標(biao),重點在于(yu)非(fei)化(hua)(hua)石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)發電。


關于我(wo)國電(dian)(dian)力發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)展現狀。2018年,全國電(dian)(dian)源(yuan)總(zong)(zong)裝(zhuang)機(ji)19億(yi)千瓦(wa),非化石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)裝(zhuang)機(ji)占(zhan)比達40.7%,其中(zhong)太陽能(neng)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)占(zhan)比達到9.2%;2018年全國總(zong)(zong)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)6.99萬億(yi)千瓦(wa)時,非化石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)占(zhan)比30.4%,其中(zhong)太陽能(neng)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)占(zhan)比僅為2.5%。由此可以看出(chu)來,非化石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)裝(zhuang)機(ji)占(zhan)比(尤其是太陽能(neng)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian))與發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)占(zhan)比之(zhi)間(jian)有(you)很(hen)大的落差。目前,太陽能(neng)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)主要(yao)是光伏(fu)發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian),其平(ping)均利(li)用(yong)小(xiao)時數是1212小(xiao)時。但是,我(wo)國非化石(shi)能(neng)源(yuan)戰略要(yao)靠發(fa)(fa)(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang),而非裝(zhuang)機(ji)量(liang)(liang)。


國(guo)家發(fa)改委、能源(yuan)局發(fa)布的(de)(de)《能源(yuan)生產和(he)消(xiao)費革命(ming)戰略(lve)(2016-2030)》提(ti)出,到2030年非化石能源(yuan)發(fa)電(dian)量占全部發(fa)電(dian)量的(de)(de)比重力(li)爭要達到50%。按(an)照這(zhe)些能源(yuan)發(fa)展戰略(lve)目標,由中(zhong)國(guo)電(dian)科院(yuan)周孝信院(yuan)士率領的(de)(de)課題(ti)組對未來的(de)(de)電(dian)力(li)構(gou)成進行(xing)了預測。


按照周孝信(xin)院士課題組(zu)的預測,到(dao)(dao)2030年太(tai)陽(yang)(yang)能(neng)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)量的占比(bi)近10%,太(tai)陽(yang)(yang)能(neng)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)(ji)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)5.73億(yi)(yi)(yi)千瓦,占比(bi)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)20%;2050年太(tai)陽(yang)(yang)能(neng)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)量占比(bi)將(jiang)(jiang)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)27%,太(tai)陽(yang)(yang)能(neng)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)(ji)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)21.576億(yi)(yi)(yi)千瓦,占比(bi)將(jiang)(jiang)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)41%;2030年太(tai)陽(yang)(yang)能(neng)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)與(yu)風(feng)電(dian)(dian)(dian)的裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)(ji)容(rong)量之和將(jiang)(jiang)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)10億(yi)(yi)(yi)千瓦,占比(bi)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)35%;2050年太(tai)陽(yang)(yang)能(neng)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)與(yu)風(feng)電(dian)(dian)(dian)的裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)(ji)容(rong)量之和將(jiang)(jiang)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)36億(yi)(yi)(yi)千瓦,占比(bi)將(jiang)(jiang)達(da)(da)到(dao)(dao)68%。


如(ru)此高比例的(de)(de)新能(neng)(neng)(neng)源裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)容量,由誰(shui)來(lai)保證電(dian)(dian)力的(de)(de)可(ke)(ke)靠供(gong)(gong)給?這(zhe)是(shi)一個非(fei)常嚴(yan)峻的(de)(de)問(wen)題。目(mu)前,光(guang)伏和(he)風(feng)電(dian)(dian)只能(neng)(neng)(neng)作為(wei)電(dian)(dian)量的(de)(de)補充(chong),電(dian)(dian)力的(de)(de)保障(zhang)要(yao)靠煤(mei)電(dian)(dian),而(er)按照(zhao)預(yu)測,煤(mei)電(dian)(dian)到2030年裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)將(jiang)下(xia)降(jiang)(jiang)到9億(yi)千瓦,2050年下(xia)降(jiang)(jiang)到4億(yi)千瓦,誰(shui)來(lai)做電(dian)(dian)力保障(zhang)?這(zhe)個問(wen)題必須(xu)要(yao)解決。所以,我們(men)必須(xu)要(yao)有可(ke)(ke)靠、靈活(huo)的(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)源或(huo)是(shi)儲能(neng)(neng)(neng)電(dian)(dian)站(zhan)提供(gong)(gong)電(dian)(dian)力保障(zhang)。在新能(neng)(neng)(neng)源電(dian)(dian)力里面,光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)和(he)生物質(zhi)發電(dian)(dian)是(shi)可(ke)(ke)以提供(gong)(gong)這(zhe)樣的(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)力保障(zhang)的(de)(de),而(er)且它(ta)具有調節的(de)(de)靈活(huo)性,所以在未來(lai)高比例新能(neng)(neng)(neng)源裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)的(de)(de)條件(jian)下(xia),光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)和(he)生物質(zhi)發電(dian)(dian)必將(jiang)發揮其應有的(de)(de)作用。


第二部分,光熱發電的優勢。


光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)是(shi)(shi)(shi)首先(xian)把(ba)光(guang)變成(cheng)熱,再(zai)(zai)通過熱能(neng)轉化(hua)產生高溫高壓蒸汽,帶(dai)動(dong)汽輪機(ji)組(zu)發電(dian)(dian),關鍵在于其(qi)(qi)配(pei)置(zhi)儲熱系統。在夏季,光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)基(ji)本可(ke)以(yi)連(lian)續(xu)24小(xiao)時發電(dian)(dian),當然,在中午(wu)時段或者晚高峰后可(ke)以(yi)降低出力(前提(ti)是(shi)(shi)(shi)不(bu)(bu)棄光(guang)),這樣可(ke)以(yi)為光(guang)伏和風電(dian)(dian)讓路。按照目前的(de)可(ke)再(zai)(zai)生能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)法,可(ke)再(zai)(zai)生能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)應(ying)該(gai)是(shi)(shi)(shi)100%收購的(de),但是(shi)(shi)(shi)為什么(me)風電(dian)(dian)、光(guang)伏做(zuo)(zuo)不(bu)(bu)到(dao)?因為其(qi)(qi)電(dian)(dian)力品質達不(bu)(bu)到(dao)電(dian)(dian)網的(de)要求,給電(dian)(dian)網造(zao)成(cheng)很大(da)的(de)沖擊(ji),盡(jin)管有法律的(de)保(bao)(bao)(bao)障(zhang)(zhang),但是(shi)(shi)(shi)它在技術層面是(shi)(shi)(shi)無法保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)的(de)。光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)是(shi)(shi)(shi)有保(bao)(bao)(bao)障(zhang)(zhang)的(de),是(shi)(shi)(shi)可(ke)以(yi)替(ti)代(dai)燃煤機(ji)組(zu)的(de),而光(guang)伏和風電(dian)(dian)則無法替(ti)代(dai)燃煤機(ji)組(zu)。光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)的(de)熔鹽儲能(neng)系統可(ke)以(yi)保(bao)(bao)(bao)證(zheng)其(qi)(qi)實現電(dian)(dian)力供(gong)應(ying),按照當前的(de)可(ke)再(zai)(zai)生能(neng)源(yuan)(yuan)法,光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)應(ying)該(gai)要100%收購,其(qi)(qi)電(dian)(dian)力品質是(shi)(shi)(shi)有技術做(zuo)(zuo)保(bao)(bao)(bao)障(zhang)(zhang)。


光(guang)熱發(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)還(huan)可(ke)(ke)以發(fa)揮(hui)調(diao)峰作用,但(dan)前提是(shi)需(xu)要有(you)相(xiang)應的(de)(de)(de)調(diao)峰電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)。目前,1.15元/千(qian)瓦(wa)時的(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)是(shi)可(ke)(ke)利用調(diao)度(du)電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia),按(an)(an)照整個生命周(zhou)期(qi)(qi)25年可(ke)(ke)用的(de)(de)(de)調(diao)度(du)、投資(zi)資(zi)本回報(bao)率10%測算的(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)。因此,光(guang)熱發(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)可(ke)(ke)以用來調(diao)峰,但(dan)是(shi)調(diao)峰電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)就不(bu)一定(ding)按(an)(an)照1.15元/千(qian)瓦(wa)時,而是(shi)不(bu)同時間采(cai)取(qu)不(bu)同的(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)。那(nei)么,光(guang)熱電(dian)(dian)(dian)站整個25周(zhou)年的(de)(de)(de)生命周(zhou)期(qi)(qi)內,每個小時的(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)是(shi)多(duo)少?我們需(xu)要有(you)法律(lv)保(bao)證,如果(guo)做不(bu)到這(zhe)一點,電(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)(jia)便沒有(you)保(bao)障。同時,電(dian)(dian)(dian)力輔助服務是(shi)隨著電(dian)(dian)(dian)力市(shi)場的(de)(de)(de)變化而不(bu)斷調(diao)整的(de)(de)(de),如果(guo)沒有(you)相(xiang)應的(de)(de)(de)購電(dian)(dian)(dian)協議,投資(zi)回報(bao)是(shi)無法預測的(de)(de)(de),這(zhe)樣銀行也不(bu)可(ke)(ke)能提供(gong)貸款,那(nei)么光(guang)熱電(dian)(dian)(dian)站的(de)(de)(de)建設無從談起。


光熱(re)發(fa)電在(zai)(zai)春(chun)秋季(ji)(ji)節的(de)(de)調(diao)控作用更加(jia)明顯,它完(wan)全可以按照電力負荷的(de)(de)需(xu)求,實現從早高(gao)(gao)峰(feng)一(yi)(yi)直(zhi)到晚(wan)高(gao)(gao)峰(feng)的(de)(de)出力,這樣對光伏和風(feng)電更有(you)利。因為我國(guo)所處(chu)緯(wei)度較高(gao)(gao)一(yi)(yi)點,光熱(re)電站冬(dong)季(ji)(ji)每日的(de)(de)發(fa)電量(liang)通常(chang)是夏季(ji)(ji)一(yi)(yi)半的(de)(de)發(fa)電量(liang),白天進行儲(chu)能,晚(wan)高(gao)(gao)峰(feng)開始發(fa)電。若遭遇極(ji)端天氣,譬如連(lian)續(xu)幾(ji)天沙塵暴,在(zai)(zai)沒有(you)光照的(de)(de)條件下,儲(chu)能便無法實現。


但是(shi),光熱發電機組在極端氣象條件下,系統缺少發電功率時,利(li)用天(tian)然氣加熱熔(rong)鹽(yan)或導熱油便(bian)可實(shi)現機組運轉,備用成本非(fei)常低。對于光伏來(lai)講(jiang),即(ji)使配置(zhi)蓄(xu)電池(chi)儲能,如果遇(yu)到類似情況,就不能夠發揮(hui)應(ying)急(ji)作用了,此時我們不可能備整臺的燃氣發電機組,常年不發電只(zhi)是(shi)為了應(ying)急(ji),這樣備用成本太(tai)高了。所以,這也(ye)是(shi)光熱發電的優勢,即(ji)便(bian)沒有光照條件仍然可以發揮(hui)應(ying)急(ji)作用。


在(zai)這(zhe)里,我(wo)想總結一(yi)下光(guang)熱發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)的(de)幾個主要(yao)優勢(shi):第(di)一(yi),出(chu)力穩定(ding),可(ke)(ke)連續發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian);第(di)二,可(ke)(ke)根據電(dian)(dian)網負荷需(xu)求(qiu)調(diao)峰;第(di)三,作為同步發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)機電(dian)(dian)源,可(ke)(ke)為系統(tong)提(ti)供短(duan)路容量(liang),具備電(dian)(dian)壓(ya)支撐(cheng)能力;第(di)四,可(ke)(ke)參(can)與一(yi)次調(diao)頻和二次調(diao)頻,并為系統(tong)提(ti)供轉動慣量(liang),增強系統(tong)穩定(ding)性。


接下來(lai),我(wo)想對比一下光(guang)(guang)熱發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)和光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)。若光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)要作為調(diao)力保(bao)證的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)源,一般(ban)要配置至少6小時(shi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)儲(chu)能(neng),才能(neng)滿足(zu)晚高(gao)峰的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)力需求。從發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)上來(lai)講,同容量(liang)(liang)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)光(guang)(guang)熱發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)機組(zu)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)是光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)2.5倍,即一座裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機100MW的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)光(guang)(guang)熱電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)站(zhan)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)相當于(yu)裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機250MW的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)站(zhan)再配置100MW電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)功率儲(chu)能(neng)6小時(shi)(配置60萬千瓦(wa)時(shi)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)儲(chu)能(neng))的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)量(liang)(liang)。經過(guo)這樣的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)對比,我(wo)們可以看到它的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)經濟性。目前,經過(guo)幾年的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)發(fa)(fa)展,光(guang)(guang)熱發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)上網電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)已經降到了約1.05元/千瓦(wa)時(shi),現在光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)加蓄電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)池的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)電(dian)(dian)(dian)(dian)價(jia)約1.233元/千瓦(wa)時(shi)。


關(guan)于光(guang)(guang)熱(re)發(fa)電(dian)的(de)調峰作(zuo)用(yong)。以(yi)新疆電(dian)網為(wei)例進行(xing)模擬(ni)計算,如(ru)果目(mu)前新疆的(de)電(dian)網裝(zhuang)設100萬千瓦光(guang)(guang)熱(re)發(fa)電(dian)機(ji)組,可(ke)以(yi)減少棄(qi)風棄(qi)光(guang)(guang)電(dian)量10%;裝(zhuang)設500萬千瓦光(guang)(guang)熱(re)發(fa)電(dian)機(ji)組,可(ke)以(yi)減少棄(qi)風棄(qi)光(guang)(guang)電(dian)量37.6%。


關(guan)于光(guang)(guang)熱(re)(re)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)的調(diao)頻(pin)作用。以西(xi)北電(dian)(dian)網為例,如果關(guan)停1200萬千(qian)(qian)瓦的火電(dian)(dian)燃煤機(ji)(ji)組,采(cai)用等容量(liang)的新能源裝機(ji)(ji)替代,有兩種(zhong)方案:一種(zhong)是新增(zeng)1200萬千(qian)(qian)瓦的光(guang)(guang)熱(re)(re)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian);另(ling)一種(zhong)是新增(zeng)1200萬千(qian)(qian)瓦的風電(dian)(dian)和光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)。如果有一臺35萬千(qian)(qian)瓦燃煤機(ji)(ji)組突(tu)然跳閘(zha),通(tong)過模擬計算可以看出(chu),在光(guang)(guang)熱(re)(re)發(fa)(fa)電(dian)(dian)機(ji)(ji)組轉動慣量(liang)的支撐(cheng)下,系統能夠(gou)維持頻(pin)率穩定。


第三部分,電力外送方案對比分析。


在我國規劃的光熱發(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)基地區域,已投運和規劃建設(she)多個特高(gao)壓電(dian)(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)外送(song)通道(dao)(dao),這(zhe)些(xie)區域也是我國光資(zi)(zi)源(yuan)(yuan)、土地資(zi)(zi)源(yuan)(yuan)比較豐富的地區,那么,如何利(li)(li)用這(zhe)些(xie)電(dian)(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)外送(song)通道(dao)(dao)實現更高(gao)比例(li)的可再生能源(yuan)(yuan)輸送(song)呢(ni)?有序建設(she)太(tai)陽能發(fa)電(dian)(dian)(dian)基地,充分(fen)利(li)(li)用這(zhe)些(xie)電(dian)(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)外送(song)通道(dao)(dao),輸送(song)可再生能源(yuan)(yuan)電(dian)(dian)(dian)力(li)(li)。


下(xia)面,我們(men)通過不同的方(fang)(fang)案(an)(an)來對比分析:方(fang)(fang)案(an)(an)一:煤電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)+光(guang)伏,這是目(mu)前(qian)采用的方(fang)(fang)案(an)(an);方(fang)(fang)案(an)(an)二:少量煤電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)+光(guang)伏+電(dian)(dian)儲能;方(fang)(fang)案(an)(an)三(san):少量煤電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)+光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian);方(fang)(fang)案(an)(an)四(si):光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)+風(feng)(feng)電(dian)(dian)。


以±800kV的特高(gao)壓(ya)直流外送通道為例,選(xuan)擇新(xin)疆哈密地區外送電(dian)力到(dao)江蘇,設(she)計輸電(dian)功(gong)率800萬千瓦,為保(bao)證受(shou)電(dian)地區的供電(dian)可(ke)靠(kao)性,電(dian)源配置原則為:可(ke)靠(kao)電(dian)源功(gong)率不低(di)于(yu)600萬千瓦,年輸電(dian)量約440億千瓦時。


方(fang)案一中,參考(kao)國內(nei)目前類(lei)似(si)的(de)直(zhi)流外送通道(dao),配(pei)置煤電(dian)(dian)600萬千(qian)瓦,風電(dian)(dian)800萬千(qian)瓦,光伏150萬千(qian)瓦。這(zhe)樣計算下(xia)來,通道(dao)新(xin)能源電(dian)(dian)量占(zhan)比(bi)44.2%。酒泉-湖南特(te)高壓輸電(dian)(dian)工程(cheng)中,燃煤發電(dian)(dian)占(zhan)比(bi)60%,現在已經棄光棄電(dian)(dian)率高達12.5%了,因此(ci),再增加新(xin)能源的(de)配(pei)比(bi),棄光棄電(dian)(dian)率還要上升。這(zhe)種方(fang)案中,無碳捕捉和儲存(CCS)的(de)情況下(xia),不含稅綜合度(du)電(dian)(dian)成本為(wei)318.7元/MWh,有(you)CCS就(jiu)會上漲到471.64元/MWh。


方(fang)案(an)二中,風電(dian)裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)容量(liang)同樣(yang)考慮(lv)800萬千瓦,煤(mei)電(dian)裝(zhuang)(zhuang)機(ji)減少到200萬千瓦,為保證與方(fang)案(an)一(yi)同樣(yang)的(de)(de)送(song)電(dian)電(dian)量(liang)和(he)電(dian)力可靠性,需配置1000萬千瓦光伏和(he)功率為400萬千瓦的(de)(de)儲能(neng)(neng)系統(儲能(neng)(neng)6小(xiao)時)。這樣(yang)算下(xia)(xia)來,新能(neng)(neng)源發電(dian)量(liang)占比(bi)就可以(yi)提升(sheng)到78.4%,在沒有CCS的(de)(de)情況下(xia)(xia),其(qi)不含稅綜合(he)度電(dian)成(cheng)本為395.9元(yuan)/MWh,有CCS則上漲到456.7元(yuan)/MWh。


方案(an)(an)三中(zhong),采(cai)用光熱發電(dian)替代光伏發電(dian)及電(dian)儲能,配(pei)置方案(an)(an)為(wei)200萬(wan)千瓦(wa)燃煤裝機、800萬(wan)千瓦(wa)風電(dian)、400萬(wan)千瓦(wa)光熱發電(dian)。這樣計(ji)算(suan)下來,新能源占(zhan)比78.5%,和第(di)二個(ge)方案(an)(an)基本相當(dang),在沒有CCS的(de)情況下,其不含稅綜合度電(dian)成(cheng)本為(wei)387.8元/MWh,有CCS則上漲到448元/MWh。


方案(an)四中,采用光(guang)熱(re)(re)發電(dian)(dian)替代(dai)全部煤電(dian)(dian)機組,配置600萬千瓦(wa)光(guang)熱(re)(re)發電(dian)(dian),800萬千瓦(wa)風電(dian)(dian)。這種方案(an)中不(bu)涉(she)及(ji)燃(ran)煤機組,因此和CCS不(bu)相關(guan),其(qi)不(bu)含稅綜合度電(dian)(dian)成本(ben)為436.1元/MWh。(注:上述成本(ben)預算是到按照2030年,包括光(guang)熱(re)(re)電(dian)(dian)價(jia)、光(guang)伏和蓄(xu)電(dian)(dian)池儲能電(dian)(dian)價(jia)都在下降(jiang)的結果來(lai)算的。)


從(cong)這四種方案中我(wo)們可以看出,在(zai)目前這種輸(shu)電(dian)模式下(第(di)一種方案),新能(neng)源的(de)電(dian)量占比約為(wei)44%,再提(ti)高(gao)就很難了。煤電(dian)在(zai)沒有(you)CCS的(de)情況下,發電(dian)成本是(shi)最低的(de),有(you)了CCS以后成本大幅上升。


方案(an)(an)三與方案(an)(an)二對(dui)比,在相(xiang)同的(de)(de)煤電和風電裝機容(rong)量條件(jian)下(xia),配置(zhi)(zhi)光(guang)(guang)熱(re)發電機組方案(an)(an)比配置(zhi)(zhi)光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)+電儲能方案(an)(an)的(de)(de)經濟性(xing)更好。雖然(ran)光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)發電的(de)(de)成本低于光(guang)(guang)熱(re)發電,但是為保障通道電力供應(ying)的(de)(de)可靠(kao)性(xing),需(xu)要配置(zhi)(zhi)較大規模的(de)(de)電儲能,而電儲能的(de)(de)造價高(gao),壽命周期短,使光(guang)(guang)伏(fu)+電儲能方案(an)(an)的(de)(de)經濟性(xing)下(xia)降。


方案四與(yu)方案三對比(bi),煤(mei)電(dian)(dian)(dian)采(cai)用(yong)CCS后,燃煤(mei)發電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本大幅增(zeng)加(jia),采(cai)用(yong)光(guang)熱發電(dian)(dian)(dian)全(quan)部替代燃煤(mei)發電(dian)(dian)(dian),外送新能源電(dian)(dian)(dian)力比(bi)重可達(da)到100%,而且經(jing)濟性更好。


總體而言,采用煤電+風電+光伏的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)電源配置方(fang)案,輸送新(xin)能源電力(li)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)比(bi)重難以繼(ji)續提高(gao);增設光熱發電裝機以后,相(xiang)比(bi)光伏+儲能的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)配置方(fang)案,它在(zai)輸電的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)可(ke)靠性和經濟性上更好(hao);若采用光熱發電替(ti)代全部的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)燃煤機組(zu),則可(ke)實(shi)現100%的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)新(xin)能源電力(li)輸送,其經濟性是(shi)最好(hao)的(de)(de)(de)(de)(de)。


第四部分,我想簡單總結一下。


首先,光熱發(fa)電機組(zu)(zu)可以實(shi)現穩定可靠的(de)電力(li)輸出,調(diao)(diao)(diao)節(jie)性能(neng)優越,可以作為(wei)電力(li)系(xi)統(tong)中的(de)主力(li)機組(zu)(zu)承擔(dan)基本負(fu)荷(he),也可以作為(wei)調(diao)(diao)(diao)峰(feng)機組(zu)(zu)承擔(dan)高(gao)峰(feng)負(fu)荷(he),可參與電力(li)系(xi)統(tong)的(de)一次調(diao)(diao)(diao)頻(pin)和二次調(diao)(diao)(diao)頻(pin),并(bing)能(neng)減少電力(li)系(xi)統(tong)對儲能(neng)電站容量的(de)需(xu)求(qiu)。


其次(ci),如果(guo)新(xin)能源電(dian)(dian)力只作為電(dian)(dian)力系(xi)(xi)(xi)(xi)統(tong)的補充,那(nei)么不(bu)需要(yao)運行光(guang)熱(re)(re)(re)機組,但如果(guo)新(xin)能源裝(zhuang)機容量(liang)高比(bi)例(li)得(de)以(yi)實現(xian),并承擔(dan)電(dian)(dian)力保證(zheng),那(nei)么光(guang)熱(re)(re)(re)發(fa)電(dian)(dian)就可(ke)以(yi)發(fa)揮(hui)其價(jia)值(zhi)了。光(guang)熱(re)(re)(re)發(fa)電(dian)(dian)替代的不(bu)是(shi)光(guang)伏(fu)(光(guang)熱(re)(re)(re)和光(guang)伏(fu)是(shi)互補的關系(xi)(xi)(xi)(xi)),而是(shi)電(dian)(dian)力系(xi)(xi)(xi)(xi)統(tong)的儲能。相比(bi)光(guang)伏(fu)發(fa)電(dian)(dian)配置電(dian)(dian)池儲能系(xi)(xi)(xi)(xi)統(tong),光(guang)熱(re)(re)(re)發(fa)電(dian)(dian)機組不(bu)僅能為電(dian)(dian)力系(xi)(xi)(xi)(xi)統(tong)提供(gong)轉動(dong)慣量(liang)的支持(chi),有(you)利于維(wei)持(chi)系(xi)(xi)(xi)(xi)統(tong)的頻率穩(wen)定,而且在極端天氣情況下,可(ke)以(yi)作為天然氣應急發(fa)電(dian)(dian)機組使用。


第三(san),結(jie)合(he)我國西(xi)電(dian)(dian)(dian)東輸戰(zhan)略,在西(xi)北的電(dian)(dian)(dian)力(li)外送通(tong)道送出端(duan)配置光熱發電(dian)(dian)(dian)機組(zu),替代燃煤機組(zu),可(ke)顯著提升(sheng)通(tong)道的可(ke)再生能源電(dian)(dian)(dian)力(li)比(bi)(bi)重,與(yu)配置光伏(fu)+蓄電(dian)(dian)(dian)池電(dian)(dian)(dian)站相比(bi)(bi),具(ju)有更好(hao)的可(ke)靠性和(he)經濟性。


謝謝大家!

最新評論
0人參與
馬上參與